Reference

Showing posts with label Building Control Systems. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Building Control Systems. Show all posts

Swiss Army Knife, wrong tool for some jobs!



Wenger Swiss Army Knife
http://www.wenger.ch/swiss-army-knives

One-Size fits all ! - I am sure you have heard it even when it's quite ridiculous and misplaced. Some jobs simply need a custom solution. 

Allow me to illustrate...

The most obvious argument is the Swiss Army Knife. (Disclosure: I am a fan) - If you are travelling light a universal tool may be a good compromise. 

But let's not forget that word - compromise. Compromise means this toolset is not optimal for solving all problems, all of the time. 

Generic specifications - What the ?!*k

Over the years I have written a few control strategy specifications for buildings.

 By the way - the pictures are some buildings where I have worked on controls specifications over the years (they have no real purpose  - but nice photos break up the words quite nicely don't you think?).

St Johns Cambridge
On more than one occasion I have been asked to write a "generic specification", which does sound really quite stupid.

NodeJSRocks - Walking the Walk

A couple of months back I said a colleague and I were messing around at a Google DevFest with some ideas for the Raspberry Pi and Arduino. We were just showing the truly disruptive potential of a zero cost great O/S on high quality low cost hardware by reading some USB themometers.

It's all very exciting to talk the talk - but sometime companies need to walk the walk. So we are please to announce that we are now sponsoring an Open Source Experiment on github.

You can read about it in it's very early form here... (A blog post by my colleague Andreas who authors the brilliant NodeJSRocks blog )

http://nodejsrocks.blogspot.ch/2013/01/measure-temperatures-with-usb.html

Actually if you have anything to do with NodeJs more generally you should subscribe to his blog.

So if you want to contribute time, ideas, code or simply have a play at getting your Raspberry Pi to graph the temperature of the coffee on your desk (or more useful applications) here is where you can.

https://github.com/asmuelle/node-temper1

Obviously, more is to come. I have been involved in specifying an entire BMS / BCS many years ago that met with some commercial success, and I think it is time we disrupted a few very slow very died-in-the-wool markets.  One thing is clear, the old days of closed protocol lock-in are still here for many energy managers and HVAC installation companies.

The intellectual input to produce an open source, openly configurable control, open-communicating system with great self-diagnostics exists. And if it were produced it would shake some corporate assumptions pretty dramatically.

So let's have some fun!

Oh - and anyone that thinks Honeywell and Siemens don't have a problem from the upstart that is Raspberry Pi had better watch out !...



PS I know about BacNet etc - but is has failed to deliver what it could on so many levels because it is built on the idea of "first risk nothing" approach.  The world has to change and that is going to take some risks. The least of which is upsetting some apple carts - so whoops !

Enhanced by Zemanta

Will we see a bloodbath in building controls ?


Arduino (from their site)
Raspberry Pi - Energy Management capabilities
Raspberry Pi (Photo credit: Fotero)

So we have been playing about a bit with Raspberry Pi and Arduino






Mainly for convenience, but also because they are cool and we are geeks and for example RPi is offering a ARM GNU/Linux box for $25 !

Bottom line - you get an awful lot of processor / interface and convenience at an absurdly low price. If we take that into the context of the building marketplace, though it may be tiny it opens up some very big questions.

We know that very low cost components in tablets and phones are unsettling consumer electronics "norms" - but what will they do in the "real world" of buildings controls (a place where incumbents are defending huge inefficiencies and have very high prices hardware).

In fact if you compare it (the Raspeberry Pi) with something non-reconfigurable with less than 1/000th of the processing power / less than 1/1000,000th of the storage capacity and less I/O functionality across the board you find it is sold by all of the following ..
MC68HC908GP32 motor controller - BEMS component
 motor controller
(Photo credit: Mitchclanky2008)

(A list lifted from Wikipedia, As you can see its a BIG industry so one I have tried to challenge even-handedly)

 Alerton Technologies,  American Auto-Matrix, AMX, LLC,  ASI Controls, Automated Logic Corporation,  Beckhoff Automation,  ABB Group, BAMI, Carrier Corporation, Celsius Benelux, CGC Solutions & Services, Cisco Systems, Citect,  Computrols, Inc., Crestron Electronics, Inc., Delta Controls, Inc., Digital Air Control,  Distech Controls, Inc., Dynalite Intelligent Light Pty Ltd, Echelon Corporation,  Energy Control Systems, EMT Controls, EnOcean,  HomePLC,  Honeywell, Iconics,  Innotech Control Systems, Invensys Building Systems, ohnson Controls Inc.,  KMC Controls,  LadderWORK, LOYTEC, Novar Controls, Panduit,  Priva, Reliable Controls Corporation, SAIA-Burgess Controls,  Sauter, Schneider Electric,  SCL Elements/CAN2GO, Siemens Building Technologies, Simple Meter (open source), SCI USA, Staefa Control System, StarDraw control, TAC (building automation), TCS Basys Controls USA, Teletrol Systems Inc., Trane Global Control Systems, Trend Control Systems Ltd.,  WAGO Kontakttechnik GmbH & Co. KG, Wonderware

Mainly (but not all) of the above have outsourced manufacturing and all sell commodity type boxes.

What differentiates these boxes is:
a) price for functionality
b) ( there is no b ) - though some are easier to configure.

So we have a range of products about to flood into markets at far less than 10% of the current price of  "named players". The market is HUGE!

So what we can expect is that they all want to differentiate, but most have routes to market (channels) that depend on price sensitive intermediaries.

What we can expect increasingly is that the "box" will become no-name, will comply with open protocols, and the money will be made by those who can figure out how best to install and configure these "boxes" cost effectively and in such a way that energy spend for comfort is minimised.

Why this  ? - because it is the sole purpose of these devices! - They aren't fashion accessories. (Ignoring that nonsensical Apple thermostat thing)

At kWIQly.com we believe we have a part to play in this process because there are some "tiny" (in the context of such a mulit-billion industry) niches where we are unquestionably out in front.

Mainly in the field of adding intelligence through pattern recognition. That tiny niche is massive - its the entire added value of controls marketplace - getting them to work better than their counterparts !

But - what does the market think ? - because in the bloodbath that's coming - that will be all that matters.

What do you think ? - let us all know in the comments.
Enhanced by Zemanta

How Now Green Con? - fraudster challenge series


In another "fraudster challenge" in our series feeding lies to energy managers today we are looking at what I call the "How Now Green Con".


OK - the name is chosen because its easy to remember - there's even a blog at
http://www.hownowgreencow.org/ who seem to be doing good things !
Energy Saving Trust Recommended logo
Energy Saving Trust Recommended logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia) - Some certifications ARE better than others ! - but some are worse.  All can be conned!

So lets first see how they phrase the con (carefully - as it always is).  It is about contrasting on and off control or "How green is it now when on Con" - trol ?".

They typically make three claims - the first two are true - the last is smart.
  • "We have a boiler sequencing Gizmo.  We attach it to any boiler, and by reducing firing when demand is low it will save you energy" - 
    • (reducing dry-cycling - it works).
  • "We have proven it in independent trials where it achieved X% energy reduction without jeopardising comfort"
    •  (these may be real trials).
  • "If it saves you 'X%' it would payback in ....weeks, so we will only charge you if it does, and this is how we will prove it. We will enable and disabled it alternatively on separate days for fourteen days.  We will compare the seven days when it was working with the seven when it was not and if you don't see an "X%" saving you will get your money back, and we will remove it - or (in an alternative) leave it in place free of charge."
    • (Don't fall for this  - maybe bookmark the answer page tomorrow for future reference )


OK that's it - simply stated.  It is legal and honest as expressed - but highly disreputable.

There are many, many, companies who run variants of this con. And some of the best engineers are suckered by it.

Can you see the con ? - Comments and discussion welcome as ever (don't be shy) - Maybe you have been conned, or would you like me to write up a specific one ?

I will write up the answer tomorrow (unless someone comes gunning for me :) - God-willing - see you tomorrow.

Update - And there it is Energy Saving Fraud - #2

By the way please tweet or "like" or whatever this one if you can. Together we can make a dent in the cash crooks are making at the expense of climate change - which is stealing the future of our grandchildren !

Enhanced by Zemanta

Does your building have its hands in its' pockets ?

English: Eiger, Mönch and Jungfrau, view from ...
Image via Wikipedia
The North Face of the Eiger gets cold ! 


I was walking along the road in Niederried the other day, looking up towards the Jungfrau range.


I was not as warm as I guess Ueli Steck must have been during his astonishing Record solo climb - in 2 hours 47 minutes - up the North Face of the 13,000-plus-foot Eiger